-
Recent Posts
- Why the cancellation of Keystone XL is bad for the climate, the environment and Canada
- The GHG intensity of the Canadian oil industry – what the scientific research actually says
- Understanding what the PBO report says about the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project
- Evaluating what the new Canada Energy Regulator report actually says about the viability of the Trans Mountain Pipeline
- Another day, another flawed CCPA report, this time about the Trans Mountain Expansion Project
Top Posts & Pages
- Why the cancellation of Keystone XL is bad for the climate, the environment and Canada
- The GHG intensity of the Canadian oil industry - what the scientific research actually says
- Alberta's Renewable Energy Conundrum in Charts and Numbers - Why Capacity Factors Matter
- Understanding what the PBO report says about the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project
- About
- Evaluating what the new Canada Energy Regulator report actually says about the viability of the Trans Mountain Pipeline
- Electrifying BC’s transportation system, debunking the myths: Part I that BC Hydro Load Estimate
- On the environmental and social consequences if the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project fails
- Debunking more misinformation about the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion project. Some simple facts about bitumen, heavy oil, and Asian Markets.
- Sorry folks, but the plural of anecdote is data
Recent Comments
Michael Woofter on The GHG intensity of the Canad… Blair on The GHG intensity of the Canad… Bob P on The GHG intensity of the Canad… Michael Woofter on The GHG intensity of the Canad… dcardno on The GHG intensity of the Canad… Categories
- Canadian Politics
- Chemistry and Toxicology
- Climate Change
- Climate Change Politics
- Energy East
- Environmentalism and Ecomodernism
- Fossil Fuel Free Future
- General Politics
- Gypsy Moth
- Leap Manifesto
- LNG
- Lukewarmers
- Oil Sands
- Pipelines
- Renewable Energy
- Risk
- Risk Assessment Methodologies
- Risk Communication
- Site C
- Trans Mountain
- Uncategorized
- Wi-Fi
Blogs I Follow
Archives
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
Category Archives: Risk Communication
How understanding Type I and Type II errors and p-values helps in assessing the conclusions of the Ramazzini Institute 13-week pilot study on Glyphosate
As regular followers of this blog know, my graduate research involved developing systems to allow data collected by researchers to be evaluated for reliability and made available for subsequent re-use by other researchers. I carried out my research in an … Continue reading
Understanding the difference between a “hazard” and a “risk” or why scare stories about glyphosate and pesticides in your food shouldn’t frighten you
I have written a lot at this blog about how chemical risks are communicated to the public and so I am often asked about news stories depicting the latest science scare story. Sometimes they are handled badly, like the CTV … Continue reading
Why sample design matters or Why that “Insects are Vanishing Paper” does not tell us much about world insect populations
As followers of this blog know, one of my big interests is evidence-based, environmental decision-making. I care that good scientific data is being used to make informed policy decisions. As such the recent “insects are vanishing” meme that is spreading … Continue reading
Academics getting it wrong about the role of private sector consultants in BC’s Environmental Assessment processes
On November 19th a group of “scientists based in British Columbia” produced an open letter to Premier John Horgan, and several of his cabinet colleagues, about improving British Columbia’s Environmental Assessment (EA) process. The letter, was from the Earth to … Continue reading
What are the real marine risks of the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion?
Every morning, starting around 7 am, the Spirit of Vancouver Island leaves its berth in Swartz Bay for its first run to Tsawwassen. On-board the Spirit are tens of thousands of liters of diesel fuel to run the ship for … Continue reading
Flu shots save both money and lives
The New Year is upon us and with the New Year comes an event as expected as the swallows return to Capistrano. What would that event be you ask? Well it must be Bill Tieleman’s annual articles against BC’s flu … Continue reading
Posted in Canadian Politics, Risk Communication, Uncategorized
5 Comments
On pipelines, oil-by-rail, and the relative risk of catastrophic spills in the aquatic environment
As my regular readers know besides this blog I also write a blog at the Huffington Post. It typically consists of shorter versions on my pieces here. Well my most recent post on the Trans-Mountain Expansion project has received a … Continue reading
On scare reporting of science and the risk of eating red meat
My twitter feed went insane this morning following a news release from The Lancet about an article titled Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. For anyone interested in toxicology, human health risk assessment or simply regular readers of … Continue reading
Posted in Risk, Risk Communication
3 Comments
On Science Communication and the Difficulty Relaying Scientific Information to the Public
This blog posting is a reminder about the difficulties communicating good science both in the media and to our fellow scientists and how challenging it is to communicate to both audiences simultaneously. This blog posting is derived from a three-way … Continue reading
Posted in Risk, Risk Communication
3 Comments