-
Recent Posts
- A pragmatic environmentalist’s view on climate change, BC LNG and the Trans Mountain Pipeline project – not either or but all of the above
- Why the cancellation of Keystone XL is bad for the climate, the environment and Canada
- The GHG intensity of the Canadian oil industry – what the scientific research actually says
- Understanding what the PBO report says about the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project
- Evaluating what the new Canada Energy Regulator report actually says about the viability of the Trans Mountain Pipeline
Top Posts & Pages
- Revisiting activist myths about the Trans Mountain Pipeline - or Why Climate leaders may sometimes need to build pipelines
- A pragmatic environmentalist's view on climate change, BC LNG and the Trans Mountain Pipeline project - not either or but all of the above
- Why the cancellation of Keystone XL is bad for the climate, the environment and Canada
- Alberta's Renewable Energy Conundrum in Charts and Numbers - Why Capacity Factors Matter
- About
- About that questionable IMF survey claiming $5.3 trillion in "subsidies" for fossil fuels
- Risk Assessment Methodologies Part 2: Understanding "Acceptable Risk"
- Why public health officials advise against masks to protect from the Coronavirus - my thoughts using lessons learned from asbestos exposure
- On Carbon Dioxide Toxicity
- The question anti-Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion activists refuse to answer
Recent Comments
Categories
- Canadian Politics
- Chemistry and Toxicology
- Climate Change
- Climate Change Politics
- Energy East
- Environmentalism and Ecomodernism
- Fossil Fuel Free Future
- General Politics
- Gypsy Moth
- Leap Manifesto
- LNG
- Lukewarmers
- Oil Sands
- Pipelines
- Renewable Energy
- Risk
- Risk Assessment Methodologies
- Risk Communication
- Site C
- Trans Mountain
- Uncategorized
- Wi-Fi
Blogs I Follow
Archives
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
Monthly Archives: November 2017
On that UBC Report comparing job numbers and the Site C Dam
My Twitter feed has been alive with news of a “new UBC Report” that according to its author, Dr. Karen Bakker from the UBC Program on Water Governance, “concludes stopping Site C will create a larger number of sustainable jobs … Continue reading
Posted in Site C, Uncategorized
7 Comments
Reviewing the demand estimates used by the opponents of Site C
This week Business in Vancouver (BiV) printed an article about the Site C project titled: B.C. might not need any additional wind power either which included a number of quotations from Dr. Harry Swain a gent with whom I have disagreed … Continue reading
Posted in Site C, Uncategorized
8 Comments
Why efforts to fight Climate Change will change the conclusions of the BCUC Site C Inquiry Report
I have been incredibly busy at work over the last few weeks and so was not able to get involved in the public consultation portion of the BCUC Site C Inquiry process. Such are the downsides of not being a … Continue reading
Posted in Canadian Politics, Climate Change, Site C, Uncategorized
12 Comments
